How Nigeria can still qualify for 2026 FIFA World Cup

When the draws for the 2026 FIFA World Cup African qualifiers were made in July 2023, few would have imagined that Nigeria’s Super Eagles would be walking a tightrope at this stage.

Group C, which looked relatively straightforward with Lesotho, Rwanda, and Zimbabwe, was widely considered one of the easier paths to the World Cup. Only South Africa appeared to offer a genuine challenge.

Yet, as the qualification series nears its conclusion, the reality tells a very different story.

Nigeria, once seen as a clear favourite, now stands on the brink — battling mathematics, momentum, and memories of past disappointments to stay in the race for North America.

Understanding the qualification format

The qualification format for the 2026 tournament is the most competitive Africa has ever seen. For the first time, the continent will send nine teams directly to the World Cup, while a tenth could qualify through an intercontinental playoff.

All 54 African nations were divided into nine groups of six teams each, with every team playing ten matches, home and away.

However, Group E was reduced to five teams following Eritrea’s withdrawal, a decision that later influenced how second-place rankings would be calculated.

Only the group winners qualify automatically. The second-placed teams are ranked based on points, goal difference, and goals scored, with results against the bottom teams discarded.

The best four runners-up will then enter a mini playoff to decide who advances to the intercontinental stage.

In essence, the route is simple but unforgiving. There is no safety net for the inconsistent. Finishing first guarantees a ticket to the World Cup. Finishing second only opens a narrow, unpredictable playoff window. Anything less, and the campaign ends abruptly.

Where Nigeria stand now

Nigeria currently sits third in Group C with 14 points after eight matches. It is a precarious position but not an impossible one.

The group standings have been fluid due to a FIFA disciplinary ruling that docked South Africa three points earlier in the campaign for fielding an ineligible player, Mokeona. That punishment, which awarded the victory to Lesotho, altered the group dynamics and kept Nigeria mathematically alive going into the final matchday.

The situation in the wider CAF runners-up ranking adds even more context.

According to the latest figures, Gabon lead the table of potential playoff candidates with 16 points. They are followed by Burkina Faso and Niger, who both have 15 points, while Cameroon, DR Congo, and Madagascar trail close behind with 13 to 14 points.

If the results against the bottom team, Zimbabwe, are removed, Nigeria, with 12 points and a goal difference of +3, remain just outside the playoff threshold.

For them, the mission on the final day could not be clearer: a victory against the Benin Republic by at least four goals.

Crunching the numbers

The arithmetic is as demanding as it is dramatic. A 4–0 or 5–1 win would lift Nigeria to 15 points and improve their goal difference to at least +7, enough to push them into the top four among all runners-up.

A 4–1 win, however, would not suffice because it leaves them level on goal difference with Burkina Faso but behind on goals scored.

The objective is not only to win but to win convincingly.

There is, however, a second scenario that could open the door to direct qualification.

Should South Africa drop points in their final group match against Rwanda, Nigeria could leapfrog them and finish top of Group C.

That would mean an automatic ticket to the 2026 FIFA World Cup without the anxiety of playoff calculations.

In simple terms, Nigeria’s fate now depends on two outcomes: a commanding win against Benin Republic and a little help from Rwanda in Johannesburg.

How it all went wrong

It has been a difficult campaign, filled with missteps that have tested the patience of fans and the confidence of the players. The Super Eagles began their qualifying run with a disappointing home draw against Lesotho, followed by another draw against Zimbabwe and a costly defeat to Benin Republic on neutral soil.

Those results set the tone for a turbulent campaign, one where Nigeria has often dominated in possession but struggled to translate that control into goals and victories.

Even with moments of brilliance from stars like Victor Osimhen and Ademola Lookman, the team’s inconsistency has become its biggest obstacle.

For a nation that has been to six World Cups since 1994, the prospect of missing two consecutive editions feels almost unthinkable. Yet that possibility looms large unless the Super Eagles summon their best performance when it matters most.

Lessons from the past

The history of Nigeria’s World Cup qualification campaigns offers both inspiration and warning. The Super Eagles famously missed out on the 2006 tournament to Angola based on the head-to-head rule, despite having the same number of points.

More recently, in 2022, a playoff draw against Ghana ended their dreams on away goals.

This time, CAF has removed such margins of error. There will be no playoffs for group winners and no away-goal tiebreakers. The only path forward is domination — total and emphatic.

The stakes couldn’t be higher

Africa’s expanded slots for the 2026 World Cup are supposed to make qualification easier, but in truth, they have only increased expectations. The continent’s traditional powerhouses, such as Nigeria, Cameroon, Ghana, and Egypt, can no longer rely on reputation.

READ ALSO: Infantino hails Ghana as fifth African team to qualify for 2026 World Cup

The so-called smaller nations — Cape Verde, Benin, Uganda, and others — have become stronger, more disciplined, and far more difficult to beat.

A closer look at the runners-up ranking shows how fine the margins are. If they fail to win their group, Gabon have already sealed their place in the playoff race with 16 points.

Burkina Faso and Niger are level on 15 points, while Cameroon’s superior goal difference keeps them in striking distance with 14 points.

Nigeria’s current 12 points and +3 goal difference leave them just outside that elite group. A 4–0 win against Benin would bring their total to 15 points and a +7 differential, likely enough to overtake Burkina Faso and Niger.

Anything less could leave them stranded, as Cameroon, DR Congo, and Uganda could still post better statistics in the second-place comparison.

For all the criticism and tactical debates that have surrounded the Super Eagles, the task ahead is straightforward: beat Benin Republic by a wide margin and wait for South Africa’s result.

Should Rwanda pull off even a draw in Johannesburg, Nigeria’s path to automatic qualification would reopen dramatically. But if South Africa win, then goal difference becomes the deciding factor for a playoff lifeline.